Understanding road closures by local councils in NSW and the appeal process

Mark Evans • November 13, 2025

This article provides a summary of the legislative framework governing the closure of public roads and the subsequent vesting of land, as well as the rights of affected individuals to appeal closure decisions in New South Wales.

The following flowchart provides an overview of the process in NSW.

Does the local council own the road?

The first thing to determine is whether the local council is the owner of the road. The Department of Crown Lands, the Transport for NSW and local councils have pretty good records of the roads they own and are responsible for.


Section 145 of the Roads Act 1993 (Roads Act) provides the hierarchy of ownership:


145   Roads authorities own public roads

(1) All freeways are vested in fee simple in TfNSW.

(2) All Crown roads are vested in fee simple in the Crown as crown land.

(3) All public roads within a local government area (other than freeways and Crown roads) are vested in fee simple in the appropriate roads authority.

(4) All public roads outside a local government area (other than freeways and Crown roads) are vested in fee simple in the Crown as crown land.


In this article we are focusing on (3) - public roads within a local government area “vested in fee simple” in the local council. “Vested in fee simple” means the local council is the owner of the freehold interest in the road.


Having determined that the local council owns the road, we can now turn to the process of how it might close the road. 


Legal Provisions for Road Closure


The process for road closure is set out in sections 38A to 38F of the Roads Act grouped under the heading “Closing of Roads”. The local council must be satisfied that the road is no longer required for public use, and that its closure will not compromise connectivity or reasonable land access for nearby landowners. A careful balancing of public interest and practical need is required before any closure process is initiated and the local council proposes to close the road.


Initiating the Road Closure Process


Having determined that the road is suitable for closure, the local council must propose to close the public road. Normally this involves council members considering the road closure at a council meeting and passing a resolution to close the road in question.


A local council that is proposing to close a public road must notify the public and relevant authorities. A proposal for closure is advertised, usually in local newspapers and via direct notification to adjoining landowners, relevant authorities, and other stakeholders.


There is a minimum period—typically set at 28 days—for the public and authorities to make submissions or objections regarding the proposed closure.



Objections, Submissions, and Council Determination


During the consultation window, anyone can provide feedback, raise objections, or suggest alternatives. Notifiable authorities, such as utility providers or emergency services, may file formal objections if the proposed closure impacts their operations.


If a notifiable authority submits an objection, the local council is generally unable to proceed with closure unless the objection is withdrawn or set aside by the Land and Environment Court.


Following the consideration of all submissions, the council records its decision—either to proceed with closure or to abandon the proposal.

If the local council chooses to proceed it must cause a notice to be sent to the Minister requesting that the road closure is published in the Government Gazette.


The council cannot proceed to close the road if there are unresolved objections by a notifiable authority.


If the road closure proceeds, a formal notice is published in the Government Gazette, and the legal status of the land changes accordingly.


Consequences of Closure and Vesting


Once closure is finalised and all objections or appeals are resolved, on the day the formal notice is published in the Government Gazette, the road is officially closed.

  • The road formally ceases to be a public road under the law, and all associated rights of access or passage are extinguished.
  • The vesting of the land—whether in the council or the Crown—determines future control, development, or sale of the area formerly occupied by the road.


What becomes of the land that once comprised the road? 

The Roads Act addresses this:

  • Previously Vested Council Roads: If the road was constructed and previously vested in the local council, the land remains vested in that council. This means the local council retains ownership and responsibility for the land. The land formerly comprising the road is operational land for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1993 unless, before the land becomes vested in the council, the council resolves that it is to be community land, in which case the land is community land.
  • Crown Land: In all other scenarios—including unconstructed roads or those already vested in the Crown—the land either becomes, or remains, Crown land. The Crown then assumes management and may allocate or dispose of the land as per broader state policies.


This distinction ensures continuity of stewardship for land assets, avoiding ambiguity about future management and use.


Selling the former public road


If the land formerly comprising the road is operational land, the local council will typically seek to dispose of the operational land.


If the land is disposed of by sale, the proceeds of sale (less the costs of the sale) are to be paid to the council.


Money received by a council from the proceeds of sale of the land is not to be used by the council except for acquiring land for public roads or for carrying out road work on public roads.


Appealing a Council Road Closure: The Role of the Land and Environment Court


The Roads Act provides checks and balances for affected parties:


Who Can Appeal? Persons referred to in section 38B(1)(b)—typically those directly affected, such as adjoining landowners—may appeal to the Land and Environment Court if dissatisfied with the council’s decision to close a public road.


Scope of Appeal: The Court is empowered to either affirm the council’s closure decision or set it aside. When the closure is set aside, it is treated as though it never occurred, effectively restoring previous rights and access.


Interaction with Other Appeals: The Act clarifies that an appeal under section 38C (for example, relating to a notifiable authority’s objection) does not preclude or limit the right to appeal the closure itself under section 38F.


These provisions ensure due process and provide avenues for redress where stakeholders believe their interests have not been adequately considered.


Why These Provisions Matter


The detailed procedures outlined in the Roads Act are designed to promote transparency, ensure fair consideration of community and stakeholder interests, and maintain clarity over land ownership and use. They balance the operational needs of local councils and the state with the rights of individuals and the public interest.


Conclusion


The closure of a public road is a significant action, impacting both present and future land use. The Roads Act establishes a robust, consultative process, providing pathways for feedback, objection, and appeal. By clearly outlining the vesting of land and avenues for legal recourse, the Roads Act safeguards both community interests and the proper management of public assets—ensuring that any change to the road network is both deliberate and accountable.





Please do not hesitate to call us on (02) 9145 0900 or make an enquiry below.

A man in a suit is sitting on the steps of a building.

Servicing all of NSW, Whiteacre provides expert property law and planning and environment law advice and assistance.

Planning Law Advice

Land and Environment Court Appeals

Voluntary Planning Agreements and Contributions

Development Control Orders and Enforcement

Property Development Advice and Due Diligence

Title Structuring

Easements and Covenants

Strata and Community Title legislation

Book an initial consultation through our website with our planning law solicitor. Whether it's about planning and environment law or property law, you can approach us and discuss your matter to make sure we are a good fit for your requirements.

BOOK ONLINE
By Mark Evans November 7, 2025
This video explores legal rights and responsibilities regarding stormwater discharge, surface runoff and the law of private nuisance. We explore how the law of nuisance applies to water flowing between neighbouring properties — and what landowners and developers need to know. Link to the Article Watch the full video here:
Physical Commencement of Development Consents
By Mark Evans October 31, 2025
Physical Commencement of Development Consents
Existing use Rights
By Mark Evans October 2, 2025
Existing use Rights
By Mark Evans October 2, 2025
This article explores existing use rights, specifically expanding and intensifying existing uses, and changes of existing uses. Part One examined the nature of existing use rights and how they are characterised. That article can be accessed here
By Mark Evans May 4, 2025
This article provides a general overview of the NSW Biodiversity Offsets Scheme, followed by a discussion of the tax implications of establishing a biodiversity stewardship site for Councils. What is the NSW Biodiversity Offsets Scheme? The NSW Biodiversity Offsets Scheme (the Scheme ) is a market-based scheme that is administered by the NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water ( Department ) and aims to help address the loss of biodiversity and threatened species in NSW. It seeks to do so by creating incentives for landowners to improve or maintain biodiversity values as a means of offsetting impacts on other areas. The Scheme is established by the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 ( BC Act ) . How the Scheme works Councils can establish a ‘biodiversity stewardship site’ ( Stewardship Site ) on eligible land within NSW by means of entering into a Biodiversity Stewardship Agreement ( Stewardship Agreement ) with the Department: s 6.17 BC Act. In doing so, Councils commit themselves to enhancing and protecting biodiversity values on the Stewardship Site. On execution of a Stewardship Agreement, the Council is entitled to receive an amount of biodiversity credits which are created by the Department. The amount of biodiversity credits are calculated by the Council’s accredited ecologist (and verified by the Department) in accordance with the methodology prescribed in the Biodiversity Assessment Method ( BAM ): s 6.7 BC Act. Biodiversity credits are created in respect of existing biodiversity values on the land and management actions to be carried out in accordance with the Stewardship Agreement. A biodiversity credit remains in force unless it is cancelled or retired: s 6.18 BC Act. The market value of the biodiversity credits is calculated by the Department at the time of creation. Sale and transfer of biodiversity credits Biodiversity credits may be sold by the Council to a buyer (or in parcels to a number of buyers) seeking to offset the impact of actions detrimental to biodiversity or to permanently secure conservation outcomes. The sale price of the biodiversity credits is determined by agreement between the Council and the buyer. Alternatively, biodiversity credits may be used by Council to offset negative biodiversity impacts arising from an activity carried out under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 : s 7.15 BC Act. The Council may transfer biodiversity credits to a buyer or third party: s 6.19 BC Act. The transfer is made through an application to the Department by the parties to the transfer. The transfer is not effective until the transfer is authorised by the Department and registered in the register of biodiversity credits: s 6.20 BC Act. On the registration of the first transfer of the biodiversity credits, the Total Fund Deposit ( TFD ) specified in the Stewardship Agreement (or a proportion, if not all the credits are transferred) is required to be paid by the buyer of the biodiversity credits into the Biodiversity Stewardship Payments Fund (the Fund ): s 6.21 BC Act. The TFD is a fixed amount of money used to cover the long-term management costs of a Stewardship Site. It is a calculated value representing the present value of future payments needed to fund the agreed management actions. Contracts for the sale of biodiversity credits between the Council and purchasers will state that the credit owner is entitled to the full amount of the agreed sale price of the biodiversity credits, including the TFD, and that the credit owner will have the obligation to pay the TFD. Once the credits have been ‘used’ to offset negative biodiversity impacts and to permanently secure the conservation of biodiversity, they are ‘retired’ such that they can no longer be used for any other purpose: s 6.27 BC Act. Annual payments are made out of the Fund to the Council in respect of management actions carried out in accordance with the Stewardship Agreement: s 6.34 BC Act. Management actions typically include obligations to fence areas of land, control exotic pest species, carry out bushfire management and weed management. In summary, annual payments made out of the Fund can help Councils meet the expenses they currently incur managing large tracts of land while achieving significant biodiversity conservation outcomes. Disclaimer This is a general overview of the Scheme and tax implications. The information in this article is general in nature and is intended as a guide only. It is not designed to be, nor should it be regarded, as legal or accounting advice. The business and financial structure for each landholder or entity managing a biodiversity stewardship site or conservation area is likely to be unique. Therefore, the way taxation law applies will depend on individual circumstances and you should consult a professional tax adviser before engaging with the Scheme or entering into a Stewardship Agreement. Capital Gains The ATO deems that a capital gains event (type D4) occurs on entry into a Stewardship Agreement: s 104-47(1) ITAA. The landowner makes a capital gain if the “capital proceeds” are more than that part of the “cost base” of the land that is apportioned to the covenant. Most state and federal government departments, including local councils are tax exempt: s 50.25 ITAA. GST on entry into Stewardship Agreement When the Department and the Council enter into a Stewardship Agreement, the Council makes a taxable supply by entering into the agreement in return for the biodiversity credits issued by the Department and the Department makes a taxable supply of biodiversity credits in return for the Council entering into the agreement. These are non-monetary transactions. The Department and the Council (if both are registered for GST): are required to pay GST in respect of their supply, calculated on the estimated value of the credits; and can claim an input tax credit (ITC) in respect of the tax invoice received from the other party. If a Council is registered for GST, the Department will issue a Department GST invoice and Recipient Created Tax Invoice (RCTI) on behalf of the Council when the Department sends the registered BSA to the Council. The Department will use the estimated market value of the biodiversity credits for the purposes of these invoices. As the GST payable and the input tax credit that can be claimed are the same amount, the net GST position for both the Council and Department is zero. This means that these invoices do not need to be paid. However, both the Department and the Council are required to account for the GST payment and the input tax credit in their business activity statements (BAS). Capital gains from sale or transfer of credits A CGT event (type A1) occurs upon the sale of biodiversity credits. The Council may make a capital gain or loss depending on the capital proceeds and cost base of the credits: s 104-10(4) of the ITAA. A biodiversity credit constitutes a CGT asset: s 108-5 of the ITAA. CGT event (type A1) happens when the Council disposes of biodiversity credits: s 104-10 of the ITAA. Most state and federal government departments, including local councils are tax exempt: s 50.25 ITAA. GST on sale of biodiversity credits For the purposes of GST, the sale of credits is a taxable supply of goods. This means that the biodiversity credit price should include GST that the Council then needs to pay to the ATO. Receipt of annual payments from the Biobanking Trust Fund Annual payments from the Fund made by the Department to the Council are a contractual payment for the performance of services and should be ordinary income and assessable for income tax purposes. Most state and federal government departments, including local councils are tax exempt: s 50.25 ITAA . GST on annual payments The supply of stewardship services by the Council to the Department in return for payment of the annual payment should be a taxable supply. The Department will issue a recipient created tax invoice (RCTI) and include an amount for GST when making the annual stewardship payments for management actions the Council delivers. Conclusion Councils can establish biodiversity stewardship sites on eligible land within NSW by means of entering into a Biodiversity Stewardship Agreements with the Secretary of the Department. On execution of a Stewardship Agreement, the Council is entitled to receive an amount of biodiversity credits. Biodiversity credits may be sold by the Council to a buyer seeking to offset the impact of actions detrimental to biodiversity or to permanently secure conservation outcomes. Biodiversity credits may be used by Council to offset negative biodiversity impacts arising from an activity carried out by Council. Some of the proceeds of the sale of biodiversity credits must be paid into the Fund to cover ongoing management actions and costs. Annual payments are made out of the Fund to the Council in respect of management actions carried out in accordance with the Stewardship Agreement. Management actions typically include obligations to fence areas of land, control exotic pest species, carry out bushfire management and weed management. In summary, annual payments made out of the Fund could help Councils meet the expenses they currently incur managing large tracts of land while achieving significant biodiversity preservation outcomes. Disclaimer This is a general overview of the Scheme and tax implications. The information in this article is general in nature and is intended as a guide only. It is not designed to be, nor should it be regarded, as legal or accounting advice. The business and financial structure for each landholder or entity managing a biodiversity stewardship site or conservation area is likely to be unique. Therefore, the way taxation law applies will depend on individual circumstances and you should consult a professional tax adviser before engaging with the Scheme or entering into a Stewardship Agreement.
Navigating Land and Environment Court
By Mark Evans March 20, 2025
Expert Legal Insights on Development Approvals and Appeals with Planning Lawyer Mark Evans
Physical Commencement of Development Consents
By Mark Evans February 27, 2025
Development consents granted after 15 May 2020 face stricter requirements to determine whether they are substantially commenced and thus remain valid. This article reviews recent case law in New South Wales (NSW) and outlines the types of work that can qualify as physical commencement.
shared driveways
By Mark Evans February 13, 2025
Shared driveways A common example of a shared driveway is where a right of carriageway passes through one neighbours’ (burdened) land into the other neighbour’s (benefited) land.
tiny homes
By Mark Evans November 27, 2024
In Part 1, we considered tiny homes and caravans on private land. That article can be accessed here Part 1 . In Part 2, we turn our attention to tiny homes and manufactured homes.
tiny homes
By Mark Evans November 22, 2024
In this article we explore tiny homes, caravans, and manufactured homes.